Debate Documents
AKN has dedicated support for parliamentary debates, committee hearings, and any proceeding structured around speeches. The <debate> and <debateReport> document types use <debateBody> instead of <body>.
Structure
<debate name="session-56">
<meta><!-- ... --></meta>
<preface>
<p>Session 56 of the Chamber of Deputies</p>
<docDate date="2006-06-15">15 June 2006</docDate>
</preface>
<debateBody>
<debateSection eId="dbsect_1" name="openingStatements">
<heading>Opening Statements</heading>
<speech eId="dbsect_1__spch_1" by="#president">
<from>The President</from>
<p>The session is now open.</p>
</speech>
</debateSection>
<!-- more sections... -->
</debateBody>
</debate>
Debate sections
The <debateBody> contains <debateSection> elements, which can be nested. AKN also provides 19 specialized section types for common parliamentary activities:
| Element | Purpose |
|---|---|
<debateSection> |
Generic debate section (most flexible) |
<administrationOfOath> |
Swearing-in ceremonies |
<rollCall> |
Roll call / attendance |
<prayers> |
Opening prayers or invocations |
<oralStatements> |
Oral statements by ministers/members |
<writtenStatements> |
Written statements entered into record |
<personalStatements> |
Personal statements by members |
<ministerialStatements> |
Statements by ministers/government |
<resolutions> |
Resolution deliberations |
<nationalInterest> |
Matters of national interest |
<declarationOfVote> |
Members declaring their vote rationale |
<communication> |
Communications to the chamber |
<petitions> |
Citizen petitions |
<papers> |
Papers laid before the chamber |
<noticesOfMotion> |
Notices of future motions |
<questions> |
Question time |
<address> |
Formal addresses (e.g., head of state) |
<proceduralMotions> |
Procedural motions |
<pointOfOrder> |
Points of order |
All specialized sections have the same internal structure as <debateSection>.
Speech elements
<speech> — A speech by a member
<speech eId="dbsect_1__spch_1" by="#diputado-valenciano">
<from>Dip. Valenciano</from>
<p>Mr. President, I rise to oppose this amendment.</p>
<p>The use of chorizo in paella is an affront to our culinary heritage.</p>
</speech>
| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
by |
Reference to the speaker (matches a TLCPerson in <references>) |
as |
The role in which they speak (matches a TLCRole) |
to |
Who they are addressing |
<from> — Speaker identification
Always the first child of <speech>:
<from>The Minister of Agriculture</from>
<question> — A question
<question eId="dbsect_1__quest_1" by="#diputada-consumo" to="#minister">
<from>Dip. Consumo</from>
<p>Can the Minister confirm whether newspaper ink is food-safe?</p>
</question>
<answer> — An answer
<answer eId="dbsect_1__ans_1" by="#minister">
<from>The Minister</from>
<p>I refer the honorable member to my previous statement.</p>
</answer>
<scene> — Stage directions
Non-verbal events during the debate:
<scene>[Applause]</scene>
<scene>[The member leaves the chamber]</scene>
<narrative> — Descriptive text
Narrative passages by the transcriber:
<narrative>At this point, the session was suspended for 15 minutes.</narrative>
<summary> — Summary of proceedings
<summary>
<p>The committee discussed 5 amendments and approved 2.</p>
</summary>
Voting in debates
Voting sections within debates use <voting>:
<debateSection name="voting" eId="dbsect_vote">
<heading>Voting</heading>
<speech by="#president">
<from>The President</from>
<p>We shall now proceed to vote on Amendment 1.</p>
</speech>
<voting>
<quorumVerification>
<count value="88" refersTo="#membersPresent"/>
</quorumVerification>
<p>Those in favor: 86. Those against: 0. Abstentions: 2.</p>
<p>The amendment is approved.</p>
</voting>
</debateSection>
For structured (computable) voting data, use the <analysis><parliamentary><voting> metadata — or the AKN Diff vote extension.
Real example: Chile Session 56
From cl_Sesion56_2.xml in the official examples:
<debate name="recurso">
<meta>
<identification source="#bcn">
<FRBRWork>
<FRBRthis value="/akn/cl/debate/recurso/2006/1076048"/>
<FRBRuri value="/akn/cl/debate/recurso/2006/1076048"/>
<FRBRdate date="2006-06-15" name="workDate"/>
<FRBRauthor href="#bcn"/>
<FRBRcountry value="cl"/>
</FRBRWork>
<!-- Expression, Manifestation... -->
</identification>
<analysis source="#bcn">
<parliamentary>
<voting eId="v_1" outcome="#aprobacionUnanime" href="#ct1-db1-vot1">
<count eId="v_1__c_1" value="0" refersTo="#SinConteo"/>
</voting>
<voting eId="v_2" outcome="#aprobado" href="#od01-pl01-V01-01">
<count eId="v_2__c_1" value="86" refersTo="#aFavor"/>
<count eId="v_2__c_2" value="0" refersTo="#enContra"/>
<count eId="v_2__c_3" value="2" refersTo="#seAbstiene"/>
</voting>
</parliamentary>
</analysis>
<references source="#bcn">
<TLCLocation eId="Sotaqui" href="/cl/..." showAs="Sotaqui"/>
<TLCOrganization eId="ministerio-de-relaciones-exteriores"
href="/akn/recurso/cl/organismo/..." showAs="..."/>
<!-- many more organizations, persons... -->
</references>
</meta>
<debateBody>
<debateSection name="agenda">
<!-- sections for roll call, committees, main debate, voting -->
</debateSection>
</debateBody>
</debate>
Note how voting data appears both in <analysis><parliamentary> (structured metadata) and in the <debateBody> (narrative transcript).
Previous: Inline elements | Next: Naming convention